Christopher Rhoades Dÿkema
Kelley wrote:
> At 02:25 PM 7/30/01 +0000, Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
> >I guess I am stupid. I don't understand what Ken or Habermas (according to
> >Ken) is saying if not this. Try this again, real slow, for the cognitively
> >challenged here. If the ideal conditions of freedom and equality are a
> >necessary condition or presupposition of communication, why or how is it
> >that we can communicate if we don't have them?
>
> did ya hear? my sister wants me to take her two kids on for awhile. she's
> just met a 75 yo millionaire and they're talking marriage. but, he doesn't
> want her kids around. if i don't take them, she's going to claim
> incompetence or something and sign them off as temporary wards of the state
> where they'll probably live with a foster family. she's thinks this is good
> in the long run. the wedding will be in two weeks. she's planning on
> getting pregnant right asap so she'll always have access to money,
> according to the prenup.
>
> my mother thinks that my sister shouldn't call herself a mother.
>
> why?