>----- Original Message -----
>From: "kelley" <kelley at interpactinc.com>
> >kind of sick that you'd piggy ahem back on this issue to push some boring
> >old party politics over jeffords ditching the pukes and the shifting power
> >plays in congress.
>
>Sorry you're disappointed to link Sulivan to "boring" issues such as who
>will control our lives, including our sexual lives, on the courts, but I
>thought the reason Sullivan was dangerous was because he was pushing
>conservative morality politically..
>
>But that's the point of the article- folks are far more interested in
>debating personal lives than the real effects of policy. It's postmodern
>gossip sanctified by the magic words "the personal is political."
it was gratuitous use of the issue. not once did you even take up the complicated issues involved and couldn't be bothered to get much of it right. furthermore, i'm not debating personal lives in the least. this isn't about gossip but about the rhetorical use of naturalized sex and sexuality and it was, when i raised the barebacking issue, an attempt to have an adult conversation about sex panic politics and safer sex campaigns. there was no attempt to talk about some one person's private life, nathan.
now, could you explain to me why you 1. seem to think that signorelle is a civil libertarian and 2. where he expressed glee? or, do you frequently write opinion pieces full of fabricated claims?