>On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, kelley wrote:
>
> > but the point is: no one would have subpoenaed lewinsky (or anyone
> > else for related reasons) in the first place and clinton wouldn't have
> > lied under oath.
>
>Caldwell's analogy between sexual harassment laws and draconian drug laws
>is still invalid.
that's not why doug forwarded the piece as a response to nathan, however.