the "prick" McReynolds

[John Halle]

>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:09:26 -0400
> From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
> Subject: Re: the "prick" McReynolds
>
>
> You're going to have a hard time developing a mass organization with
> such a contemptuous tone and snide references to "buggery."
>
> Let him without sin cast the first stone, as the guy said.
>

You misunderstand.

My contempt is reserved for those who regard analytical studies of common
sexual practices to be a real contribution to and engagement in
"trangressive"  politics. It is not directed at those who engage in these
or any other mainstream or non-mainstream forms of sexuality.

The point was that "contempt" and "snide reference" is generally reserved,
on the part of leftist "cops," for those who actually attempt to make a
real, as opposed to a merely theoretical, contribution to mass organizing.

Shall I be more specific?

Is this not clear?

John