The decline of commercial agriculture

Michael Pugliese debsian at pacbell.net
Thu Jun 14 04:19:01 PDT 2001


Heh! Is this the colloidal silver scam? The Spotlight always has ads for colloidal silver generators for $99.95. http://www.m2ktalk.com/colloidalsilver.htm I looked into this a few months ago,

this is what it did to one woman. http://homepages.together.net/~rjstan/ www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/PhonyAds/silverad.html

http://www.google.com/search?client=googlet&q=Our%20physical%20well-being%20 is%20more%20directly%20dependent%20upon%20minerals%20

http://www.google.com/search?q=Colloidal+silver+hoax http://www.google.com/search?q=Colloidal+Silver+scam

Michael Pugliese


> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Walter <willw at mediaone.net>
> To: Michael Pugliese <debsian at pacbell.net>
> Date: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Colloidal silver generator
>
>
> >Dear Mike, What is the point of this or more to the point what is your
> take
> >on this. All that I can say is that last night i had a bug and did some
> >silver and I am 100% this morning! Also the Astronauts take this up with
> >them as a cleaning agent and a cure all every time they go up. The FDA
is
> a
> >gov't org. and they aren't to be trusted as they are run by the
Rockefeller
> >groups and are in charge of most of the world now and want us all sick
and
> >takeing the pills that the so called doctors are taught to prescribe to
us
> >as they only schooling technique. Iron Will
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Michael Pugliese" <debsian at pacbell.net>
> >To: <willw at mediaone.net>
> >Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:30 PM
> >Subject: Re: Colloidal silver generator
> >
> >
> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=Colloidal+silver+hoax
> >>
> >
>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Reese" <reeza at flex.com> To: "michael perelman" <michael at ecst.csuchico.edu> Cc: "Michael Pugliese" <debsian at pacbell.net> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:24 AM Subject: Re: The decline of commercial agriculture


> At 06:27 PM 6/13/01, michael perelman wrote:
> >William Albert Albrecht, a famous soil scientist, made that point about
> >50 years ago. I never met him but we corresponded and when he retired
> >he sent me a package of his reprints. I discussed this in a very old
> >book, Farming for Profit in a Hungry World. The idea was that pushing
> >yields up created an imbalance within the plant, both because of
> >breeding as well as farming methods that destroyed the soil.
> >
> >He was one of the premier soil scientists, well respected in his
> >profession. He was in Iowa and much of his work concerned hybrid corn.
> >Later, I was on a Department of Ag. panel Some of the scientists told
> >me that they felt uncomfortable around him because he was too good at
> >defending his position.
> >
> >> Brenda Rosser wrote:
> >>
> >> Daily Mail, March 5, 2001
> >>
> >> FRUIT and vegetables are not as good for us as they were 50 years ago
>
> <brevity snip>
>
> Hi,
>
> This is offlist, I'm not subscribed on this email account.
>
> If you care to dig a little deeper, you will find it was read into
> congressional testimony back in the 1930s, deeper still and you will
> find it was read by a 1930s version of James Trafficant, from some
> tabloid of the day.
>
> There may be something to it all, but if that 1930s congressional
> record is the best evidence so far, I'll pass on the ulcers and
> gray hair. Perhaps Michael Pugliese can find out a bit more on
> it, I'll take the liberty of sending him a Cc:,,,
>
> Is any of Mr. Albrecht's work accessible via the net?
>
> There is a Dr. Wallach who is making much smoke and uses some mirrors,
> see http://www.american-nutrition.com/index.html for an example. He
> mentions the 1930's congressional record, I now see he also mentions
> a 1992 earth summit report - I'll have to look into that and see if
> it is based solely on 70-year old sensationalism, or if it brings any
> new research to the table.
>
> Reese
>
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list