<< Um I know I didn't write this. >>
No, I did, and I already posted this to the list:
<< Sorry for the clumsy construction. I wasn't implying it for Frank. >>
I don't accept blame for Brad DeLong's clumsy clipping of my earlier post, however, and the subsequent implication that you wrote what I wrote...
----Original Message Follows---- From: Catherine Driscoll <catherine.driscoll at adelaide.edu.au> Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Subject: Re: academic economics Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:19:49 +0900
Um I know I didn't write this.
----- Original Message ----- From: Brad DeLong <delong at econ.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Friday, June 22, 2001 2:13 am Subject: Re: academic economics
> >Catherine Driscoll wrote:
> >
> >BTW, re money going to a few superstars: Hasn't this been
> recognized
> >for some time by economists (who of course for the most part have
> no
> >problem with it), and wasn't it even somewhat popularized by
> Frank
> >and Cook in "The Winner-Take-All Society"?
>
> The implication that Bob Frank has "no problem" with winner-take-
> all
> markets is false.
>
>
> Brad DeLong
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com