Michael McIntyre
>>> jkschw at hotmail.com 06/25/01 03:22PM >>>
Gramsci called his Modern Prince (the Party) "totalitarian," with no
negative implication.
--jks
>From: Michael Pugliese <debsian at pacbell.net>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>To: lbo <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com>
>Subject: Re::Fascism" Re: China Fascism weeds out the "unfit" from higher
>education
>Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:51:49 -0700
>
> Carrol, what's her name is Jeanne Kirkpatrick. Need some gincko(sic.?)
>Helps with memory. In fact I need some!
> Re: Totalitarianism: Pre-dates the Cold War Liberals, the category,
>label, that is. First usage, late 20's, by German leftists. See, "The Lost
>Debate: German Socialist Intellectuals and Totalitarianism, "
>William David Jones, Univ. of Illinois Press. Blurbed by Doug Kellner and
>Stephen Eric Bronner.
>http://www.press.uillinois.edu/f99/jones.html
> "Totalitarianism
>The Inner History of the Cold War
>ABBOTT GLEASON
>http://www.oup-usa.org/isbn/0195050185.html
> New Leftish critique of Totalitarian thesis, see collection of essays by
>Thomas Patterson, title is something like, "The Merger of the Image of Nazi
>Germany and Soviet Russia in the 40's: "Red Fascism", " originally in the
>AHR or JAH in 1970.
>Michael Pugliese
>P.S. I agree with Carrol, that fascism has to be a strictly delimited term.
>For the best on fascism, from a poli sci guy, see Roger Griffin.
>http://www.brookes.ac.uk/schools/humanities/staff/hirg.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com