Clinton to NAACP: "I think I was the first black president"

Brad Mayer bradley.mayer at ebay.sun.com
Mon Mar 5 18:35:20 PST 2001


It actually appears that Morrison gushed, not over Clinton, but over the US Constitution: "Early this week, a neighbor called to ask if I would march. Where? To Washington, she said. Absolutely, I answered, without even asking what for. "We have to prevent the collapse of our Constitution," she said. " Yeah, right, off to 'save the Constitution'. Ah, the hyperbolic hysterics of liberals.

On the other hand the relevant passage, while not gushing over Clintons' "blackness", does attempt the rhetorical ploy of _itself representing_ aspects of Clintons' character - _real_ and not 'representational' characteristics, such as "single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald's-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas" - as displaying "almost every trope of blackness" so that, Morrison claims, "African-American men seemed to understand it right away".

Oh really? Put aside the unprovable statement about whether African-American men really understood it this way. It is more important to see that it is Morrison who mobilizes racist "tropes of blackness" in the service of rallying middle-class liberals (African American or otherwise) to support a politician who just happens to act out these stereotypes in his own real life. But for Clinton these stereotypes are, instead, his own lived behavior.

In itself, Clintons' behavior is not a "representation" of anything. It was only due to the accident that this character also happened to be President that the Morrisons of the world could utilize this character as a - precisely racist -"representation" of "blackness".

And we wonder why Reagan and Clinton were so popular. What else does one expect here in the society of limitless self-loathing and low self-esteem? Liberals love this stuff as they love all suffering, as a vampire loves blood.

-Brad Mayer Oakland, CA
>I remembered Morrison's piece as "gushing" too, but if you look at the
>relevant passage it's a little more complicated than that---more about how
>representations of Clinton display (racist) "tropes of blackness," how he's
>criminalized/sexualized, etc. in the same way that black men are. Now it's
>mutated into something positive for Bill to gloat about, which doesn't seem
>to be what Morrison or Chris Rock had in mind.


>By the way, note that Morrison attributes the notion to unnamed "black men"
>during Whitewater, so maybe it was Chris Rock's idea in the first place.
>Gary Ashwill



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list