> Now aside from the macabre delight one can take in contemplating a
> "neoliberalism" in which labor can move across borders without let or
> hindrance but in which investment bankers die of thirst in the Sonoran
> desert smuggling capital into Mexico, there's a question here that I think
> is worth following up. Doesn't it seem plausible that a neoliberal regime
> that makes capital far more mobile than labor favors capital and hurts
> labor? (And not just in capital-rich countries a la Stolper-Samuelson).
> I've been trying to think through this problem along two separate paths,
> neither with a great deal of success.
>