> (Incidentally, it should be noted that Freud was an early
> anti-Zionist but later modified his view when Nazi persecutions of
> European Jews made a Jewish state seem like a possible solution to
> widespread and lethal anti-Semitism. But I believe that his position
> vis-à-vis Zionism was always an ambivalent one.)
In the thirties Freud corresponded with the German Jewish writer Arnold Zweig, who had gone to Palestine and become a Zionist. Zweig wrote and solicited his view on Zionism, which Freud said he had come to support, as a result of the rise of Nazism. But he said that Zionism was supportable because it was an essentially secular movement. Clearly Freud would have opposed the present reality of a supposedly "modern" state accepting as normal the participation in governance of an openly racist religious tendency.
Interestingly, Zweig himself became disillusioned with Israel. In the fifties he left and became a citizen and significant cultural figure in the German Democratic Republic.
Christopher Rhoades Dÿkema