>Mat & Justin have already made an argument that practicalities are
>not the problem. What's your objection to them?
1) Defining race. 2) Defining eligibility after defining race. 3) Defining the mechanism of reparation (America's plan reinforces capitalist logic; you want to undermine it. Robinson would make tuition free; everyone should have free tuition.) 4) Deciding whom to exclude - if you include the descendants of slaves, why not Indians? Why not the Latin Americans we've bled for eons? 5) Deciding how to fund them - should working class whites be taxed, or just bourgeois whites?
There, that's a start.
Doug