>Whether you wish to admit it or not, when you approve, morally, of the
>bombing of foreign targets by the U.S. military, you are approving of acts
>morally equivalent to the bombing in Oklahoma City.
Did he have any political motivation, however twisted, or is this a retrospective rationalisation?
To the extent there is any truth in the proposition, it is an argument for making the US responsible to some sort of world court as rapidly as possible.
Chris Burford
London