judicial tyranny

[Justin Schwartz]

OK, there's no distinction. The judge just asked to me look up whether some 
plaintiffs can maintain a malicious prosecution action. Shall I say, Judge, 
you are a liberal Democrat, and these are plaintiffs suing a city that "we 
all know" is corrupt. Sure they can. I'll write it that way, because law is 
just politics. I don't need to worry about whether they have satisfied the 
elements of this cause of action, that's just window dressing, ideological 
folderal. Good idea? On the other hand, the plaintiffs are cops, and as 
liberals, don't we hate cops? So maybe we should find for the city because 
cops are bad. Oh, what fun, law is totally indeterminate.

--jks


>
>Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
>>This isn't politics. It's law.
>
>Fascinating distinction.
>
>Doug

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com