Radio France confirms Laden / CIA meeting]

[Kelley]

At 09:07 PM 11/1/01 -0800, Thomas Seay wrote:
>Kelley,  I have not been prone to believe any of the
>"conspiracy theories" but I have been busy following
>them and, dropping work in the middle of the
>afternoon, in order to translate them.  Why?
>Because, despite what someone said this morning, Le
>Figaro is a respectable newspaper (not some ragsheet)
>and, I guess, is probably the second most important
>newspaper in France (after Le Monde).  It is also
>a conservative newspaper and so not prone to give
>stories a left spin.  For these reasons, I take these
>reports seriously, albeit critically.

sure, i understood that--you snipped the part where i said i did! :)


>Of course it could just be disinformation, but I do
>take it much more seriously than the plethora of
>conspiracy theories floating about the web.  If it is
>true, then what are the implications?

that is what i was asking?!  i mean, carrol was even forwarding related 
material. carrol!? he was getting on everyone for conspiracy theories not 
too long ago. so now Carrol is forwarding? hey wot?!  this means the ultra 
left is het up and excited about something more than just the usual 
excitement generated by right sniffing lefties.

for Hakki, this fits into his pipeline thesis: this wasn't just that the US 
engineered the bombing and invasion of Afghanistan after the fact, but that 
the US government actually orchestrated 9-11 in order to bomb/invade/nation 
build Afghanistan.

implications? you tell me. the story was aired in the washtimes and by 
newsmax, btw.


> > i'm not keeping up with threads, so spank me if i'm
> > misunderstanding the strange excitement frothing around this story.


>Ok, sounds kinky to me ;)

oh, such a vanillahetbuoy response! :)

kelley