bigotry is constitutional?

[Dennis]

> But KKKers don't generally burn crosses in their own yards, to "express"
> their bigotry.  It's usually done on someone else's property and intended
> (and understood) expressly as a threat.  Doesn't that put it in a somewhat
> different category than just speech?  Not incitement, exactly (though it
> could be that), but sort of like scrawling "I'm going to kill you" on
> someone's door.  Burning crosses, considered abstractly, might be
protected
> speech; but doesn't context matter?


> Gary Ashwill

Mr. Berlet may correct me, but my general take is that the KKK usually burns
crosses in a field at night during a private rally or ceremony. The days of
burning crosses on people's lawns are more or less gone, so far as I know.

DP