>Fuck
Art McGee wrote:
>Fuck
Brian Atinsky wrote:
>Fuck
Rob wrote:
>Fuck
Kelley wrote:
>Fuck
I mean come on gang. While I'd certainly be the last to deny that using abusive and violent language to an attractive woman has a certain sexual thrill to it, it's usually regarded as more gentlemanly to
a) retain the services of a professional for the purpose b) do so in more privacy than is available on a non-specialist mailing list.
I can supply offlist the addresses of a few good places in London, New York and Edinburgh; I daresay Rob (who has always struck me as a man of the world) coud add a few in Sydney and Melbourne; as for the rest of the world, well, there's a big Internet out there, and most of it seems to be specifically designed for answering questions like that.
In the meantime, I'd like to add my name to Art's as an lbo-talk subscriber who reckons he's a bit "tasty". Are there any other LBO readers who fancy a fight? We could start a league or something.
dd
PS: by the way, I was running a few numbers last week, and it appears that Rob called the bottom of the NASDAQ as well as the top. Remember that the "Rob Schaap 350% Theorem" went as follows:
"According to my rough scrawlings, every boom cranks the market up 350%, and then unwinds it a good way in a hurry."
If this contained an implied prediction that the NASDAQ would bottom out at or near the September 1998 low which marked the beginning of the boom, it was spot on. NASDAQ's lowest print was at 1423 on 21 Sept. Anyone buying on that day on the basis of the RS350T would have profits of 22% so far.
Get Your Free Email at http://www.al-islam.com