Doug
Hakki Alacakaptan wrote:
>Thanks for illustrating my point. I won't bother with the anklets, though,
>as you might try to pigeonhole their clink as well. I'm bored enough as it
>is.
>
>Hakki
>
>
> || -----Original Message-----
> || From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> || [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of Mina Kumar
> || Perhaps that whereof one cannot speak one should remain silent,
> || or whatever
> || it was the Wit(t) said.
> ||
> || I was going to say that referring to black people's "nihilistic
> || hatred" is
> || usually an indicator that the speaker is somewhere between
> || Allan Bloom and
> || Saul Bellow, politically, but now with the weeping over how PC
> || has silenced
> || discussion, it seems even more apropros.
> ||
> || You could always wear anklets and clink indicatively.