>Burford: declares that it is necessary for the anti-war movement to raise
>"global government" issues.
>
>Paulsen: asks what class content this has.
>Seay: in order to disrupt this thread, throws out a jibe about Hungary in
>1956.
your question was just as irrelevant and disruptive to chris's claims. you clearly don't like chris's argument in the same way that thomas doesn't like your arguments.
>Paulsen: points out the irrelevance of what Seay is doing.
>
>Kelley: in her "turd post", asks why I'm not conversing with Seay directly.
"fuck" me dead. what is this "shit"? you can't even type the "dicky" little word "turd" in a straightforward way. what a "pussy".
heh.
chill out and can man.
kelley