A note to the exorcists

[Hakki Alacakaptan]

Chip, I'm not going to discuss your ridiculous "proof" supposedly clearing
Buck Revell or anything else with you because you seem to be incapable of
rational argument beyond a certain level. I methodically took your
conspiracist attack apart and all you can come up with is a story making
Revell out to be a hero and informing us that he is silencing people through
litigation? Gee, wasn't that what he did all the time for Ollie? You skip
over anything you can't disprove, sling mud, call people names, and
sidetrack the issue by bringing up masses of irrelevant data. You debating
style, such as it is, is more suited to convincing Christian groups that
right-wing conspiracies are bad thing. You should keep to that and stop
pestering me.  I thought we'd already agreed to disagree. Rest assured that
people on this list are not lumpen; they can make up their own minds.

I suggest you contribute to the list by showing us your research. What have
you got to offer that disproves the Interfor report? How can you prove that
the holes in the case against the Libyans aren't there? Without evidence,
your opinions are uninteresting.

Hakki

 || -----Original Message-----

 || From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com

 || [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of Chip Berlet

 ||

 || There is no "well-documented" case for CIA collusion in the Lockerbie

 || boming. It is all conspiracist speculation.