Disabused innocence here. The international arena has always been anarchic. There never was a good old days when international law was happily followed or the great powers were good guys.
We can speak in moral terms,
>of course, but our discourse will be negative, for the concepts we use are
>no longer institutional.
What does that mean?
We should take care that any crimes we impute on a
>state from now on should not be understood as crimes in the legal sense,
>for
>when top cop is the biggest criminal, the definition of crime collapses.
>
Then there never were any international crimes.
I find this discussion uninteresting. Let's move on
jks
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp