Chomsky: Reply to Casey

[Stephen E Philion]

I've brought that up with Casey several times and he just ignores it. It's
the transparent flaw in his entire 'argument' against Chomsky.
Steve

On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Doug Henwood wrote:


> Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
> >What puzzles me about this whole discussion--not just with Leo, but
> >also with Hitch--is the narrow focus on a single analogy. Chomsky's
> >general point, that US foreign policy regularly involves actions
> >that cause more deaths than and have as little justification as the
> >attacks of 9/11, is surely hard to dispute, and I can't imagine
> >either Hitch, even the new Hitch, or Leo disputing this.
>
> Leo repeatedly refuses to address this point - here, there, and
> everywhere he's been propagandizing at tireless (and tiresome) length.
>
> Doug
>