different wars

[Carl Remick]

>Luke Weiger wrote:
>
>>I concur with the spirit your response, but Carl's question deserves more
>>than a rhetorical question in reply.  If you're going to advocate any 
>>course
>>of action (including non-action), you shed the protective shell from
>>skepticism agnosticism provides.
>
>It's a "when did you stop beating your wife?" kind of question. As
>Miles pointed out, there's no course of action in which 0 civilian
>deaths are likely. Clearly I'd like it to be close to 0 as humanly
>possible.
>
>Doug

Or as close to 0 as is consistent with your "considerable use of force."

Carl

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp