email snoopin'

Matt Cramer cramer at unix01.voicenet.com
Thu Oct 25 05:19:37 PDT 2001


On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Doug Henwood wrote:


> I asked Panix what they knew of this. Here's their answer:
>
> >Panix's response is likely to be what it has been-- we'll comply
> >with a court order.
> >
> >As of now, we have no specific information as to just how bad
> >it is, or what will be required, so it's hard to make a statement,
> >but if we refuse and they shut us down it doesn't do anyone
> >much good.

Federal wiretapping laws would make it a crime fo an ISP to disclose that they were actually using the snooping software. To be honest I'm surprised they even answered the question at all.

If people desire anonymity, integrity, and security in their email, the way to do it is with the mathematicas of cryptography, not by relying on others (especially behemoth ISPs and the State) to respect our rights.

See http://www.faqs.org/faqs/privacy/anon-server/faq/use/part1/preamble.html for more information on email security and anonymity.

Matt

-- Matt Cramer <cramer at voicenet.com> http://www.voicenet.com/~cramer/ PGP RSA Key ID: 0x1F6A4471 aim: beyondzero123 PGP DH/DSS Key ID: 0xAFF35DF2 icq: 120941588

yahoo msg: beyondzero123 Puritanism: the haunting fear that somebody, somewhere, might be having a good time.

-H.L. Mencken



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list