On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Kelley wrote:
> At 10:20 AM 10/29/01 -1000, Stephen E Philion wrote:
>
>
> >--All of which is even more besides the point since who would disagree
> >with what you've just said to begin with? The plain obvious as a
> >'response'...
> >
> >Steve
>
>
> uh, you disagreed. duh. i just told you that, if you can apply that
> reasoning to that situation, then the majority of USers apply your exact
> reasoning in terms of whether they are unforgiving or not. they will accept
> structuralist explanations, but for some people they do not cut them any
> slack, just like you don't cut any slack to the letter writer. the issue
> isn't about statistics and probabilities, it's about their moral values
> which you apparently share, but not always, which just makes you look like
> the thread title.
>
> kelley
>
>