Antiwar movement losing steam?????

[Max Sawicky]

Certainly not OBL.  It fails to include measures that
would bring him to ground; concessions to Muslims or
anyone else sends the message that his attack was worthwhile
and that more might even be better; any such concessions will
be inadequate in his view (especially a "just peace in the ME");
and defense of civil liberties (which I'm for) makes it easier
for him to mount further attacks.

This is not a policy, not because its elements are bad things.
They aren't.  They are not responsive to what in the Sam Hill
is going on.

mbs


>- cooperative police work between nations to catch the perpetrators
>- international tribunals to try them for war crimes to assure global
>acceptance of their trials
>- addressing real grievances of the muslim world (such as the Palestinian
>cause) to isolate the murderers from the general population
>- global economic justice to eliminate the misery which feeds resentment
>against the US and sympathy for such terrorism
>- defense of civil liberties in favor of sane security measures that don't
>breed more police abuses and cycles of resentment and violence

Anyone have a problem with that list?

Carl

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp