Alterman's latest

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Tue Oct 30 02:33:21 PST 2001


On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Doug Henwood wrote:


> I'm not surprised. Reducing it to a $500m nonlethal aid program misses
> the political point - Zbiggy & Co. wanted to draw the Soviets in.

An interesting interview wtih Brzezinski on that point:

http://www.nonviolence.org/commentary/104.php

Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski

Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p. 76*

Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his

memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services

began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the

Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security

adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this

affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA

aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the

Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality,

secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was

July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for

secret aid to the opponents of The pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And

that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained

to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet

military intervention.

Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action.

But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and

looked to provoke it?

B: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene,

but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that

they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United

States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there

was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?

B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had

the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you

want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed

the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the

opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for

almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the

government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and

finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.

Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic

[intégrisme], having given arms and advice to future terrorists?

B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban

or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or

the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?

Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated:

fundamentalism represents a world menace today.

B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard

to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam

in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the

leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what

is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate

Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian

secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.

* There are at least two editions of this magazine; with the

perhaps sole exception of the Library of Congress, the version sent

to the United States is shorter than the French version, and the

Brzezinski interview was not included in the shorter version.

______________________________________________________________

The above has been translated from the French by Bill Blum Author,

"Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War

II" and "Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower"

Portions of the books can be read at:

http://members.aol.com/superogue/homepage.htm (with a link to

Killing Hope)

If anyone whose French is better than mine can translate the

bracketed word, "intégrisme", I'd appreciate hearing from them

bblum6 at aol.com

__________________________________________________________________________ Michael Pollak................New York City..............mpollak at panix.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list