======== There's no *i* in the spelling.
Isn't the question now that, if it can't do the justificatory work it's been put to in philosophical and legal discourse to apportion the social production of assets, what will replace it and what justifies any post-Lockean apportioning of titles-deeds-claims to ecosystem services and intellectual and technological 'products' that result in the monstrous inequalities of wealth and power all around us today? If Nozick and Jensen and Epstein and Hart and Narveson are kaput........?
Ian