----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad DeLong" <jbdelong at uclink.berkeley.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 6:58 PM Subject: Re: FT article by John Kay
> >Ian Murray wrote:
> >>
> >> > Yep. But I never liked the Lockeian paradigm...
> >> >
> >> > Brad DeLong
> >>
> >> ========
> > > There's no *i* in the spelling.
> >>
> >
>
> Lockean
> Lockeian
> Lockeist
> Lockist
> Lockenik
>
> Barrian
> Barroian
> Barrovian
>
> Ricardoian
> Ricardoan
> Ricardan
> Ricardian
> Ricardist
>
> The rules here appear subtle and inconsistent...
=================
Fair enough; maybe there are no rules, just Shannon-like distributions over the total of different spellings/uses. :-)
Ian