global warming as political science
Brad DeLong
jbdelong at uclink.berkeley.edu
Mon Sep 10 12:12:02 PDT 2001
>Hot Air is Bad for Us
>By Alexander Cockburn
>The current uproar over the posture of the Bush administration on
>global warming and, most recently, on power plant emissions vividly
>illustrate the political hypocrisy and opportunism imbuing debates
>on environmental issues.
>
>Take first global warming. The charge that the current phase of
>global warming can be attributed to greenhouse gases generated by
>humans and their livestock is an article of faith among liberals...
>Yet the so-called "anthropogenic origin" of global warming remains
>entirely non-proven...
So what does Cockburn think is "not proven"?
--That human activity is dumping a lot of CO2 and CH4 and other
things into the atmosphere?
--That over the next century human activity is going to dump a lot
more CO2 and CH4 into the atmosphere?
--That human activity-produced CO2 and CH4--like other CO2 and CH4
molecules--in the atmosphere trap heat?
What remains to be proven?
Brad DeLong
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list