Hi-jack fall-out

Marco Anglesio mpa at the-wire.com
Tue Sep 11 21:29:39 PDT 2001


On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ken Hanly wrote:
> It hurt the US by showing that it is not invulnerable to attack and its
> symbols can be destroyed.

Actually, the "man on the street" interviews that I've seen seem to indicate a greater, not a lesser, preference for isolationism. People say that they should seek vengeance, that they should take stock of their international obligations.

Progressives, or at least those progressives who subscribe to LBO-Talk, see it as a reason for the US to be more involved in the international scheme, to be more willing to espouse a policy of multilateralism. But we wanted those things anyway; we'd see any debacle or disaster originating from overseas as promoting this.

Marco

,--------------------------------------------------------------------------.
> | With sufficient thrust, <
> Marco Anglesio | pigs fly just fine. <
> mpa at the-wire.com | However, this is not <
> http://www.the-wire.com/~mpa | necessarily a good idea. <
> | --RFC 1925 <
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------'



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list