Nathan corrected

Nathan Newman nathan at newman.org
Thu Sep 13 06:16:30 PDT 2001


----- Original Message ----- From: "James Heartfield" <Jim at heartfield.demon.co.uk>

In message <0ace01c13c46$ad2d77e0$4d1f0f41 at home.com.excite.home.com>, Nathan Newman <nathan at newman.org> writes
>
>What you said was that the intent of the terrorists was justified, but you
>disagreed with their strategy.

-But what you dishonestly try to cover up is that I qualified the above -points with an unequivocal statement that the act of terrorism was -wrong.

No, you said it and its supporters were anti-democratic, infantile, and ineffective. Nowhere did you express any moral view on the acts. It is precisely the absence of moral condemnation in so many of these posts combined with their abstract analysis that emphasizes the moral vacuum.

-- Nathan Newman



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list