----- Original Message ----- From: "Carrol Cox" <cbcox at ilstu.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 8:03 PM Subject: Re: CNN found using fake footage
>
>
> kelley wrote:
> >
> > At 12:41 AM 9/16/01 -0700, Lawrence wrote:
> > > >>>
> > >MBS:
> > >Now is the time, I would say, to address chauvinism
> > >and indiscriminate military actions, not for christ's
> > >sakes to advance a 'left' agenda.
> > ><<<
> > >
> > >For my part, I will never understand why anyone would ever want to be
seen
> > >as advancing a "left" or "right" agenda. Why not be seen as advancing
an
> > >"intelligent" agenda? Why not be seen as advancing the "best" agenda?
Or the
> > >wisest? Or the most informed? Why "left" or "right"? It amazes me that
some
> > >people identify with these labels, so much that they want to compete
for it.
> > >As a purely practical matter, I think most of the public wants to hear
the
> > >"best" agenda, not a "left" or "right" one. But even if pragmatism is
not a
> > >concern, I still have never understood why someone would prefer
labeling
> > >their opinion as "left" rather than "intelligent."
> >
> > because 'left' in this space--LBO--doesn't mean left as it is meant in
> > common parlance. left means utilizing a materialist analysis, at it's
most
> > basic level.
> >
>
> Someone recently quoted Che: "It's not my fault," he said, "that reality
> is marxist."
>
> Carrol