BOYCOTTS FOR STORES NOT POSTING PAPERFLAGS

[Jeffrey Fisher]

the last thing i heard, the two women mentioned in the post were as yet
unidentified in terms of any organizational affiliation and corresponding
organizing infrastructure.

i'll post anything more that comes through.

on a related note, i hear that one german publisher has required the
journalistic staff of one of its papers to agree to new contracts enforcing
standing "in active solidarity with the USA." unconfirmed . . .

and of course there's now a man in arizona prison for (allegedly) murdering
a sikh in an apparent act of backlash/retaliation.

j


> From: Thomas Seay <entheogens at yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
> To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> Subject: Re: FW: BOYCOTTS FOR STORES NOT POSTING PAPERFLAGS
> 
>> i hope people won't actually participate in such a
>> boycott and people like
>> this are just blowing smoke. we'll see.
> 
> jeffrey, this is INCREDIBLE.
> Will you please keep us posted on how this
> progresses ?
> 
> Thomas
>> 
> 
> 
> =====
> <<If the purpose of the action is not to the advantage of the doer but of him
> who commands, then the doer is a slave, and does not serve his own interest.>>
> -Spinoza
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
> Donate cash, emergency relief information
> http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/