Ian Murray wrote:
>
> >
> >
> Historical knowledge is never independent of all agents ethical
> preferences
I think this is an empty proposition, but perhaps I simply don't understand it. The only content I could give to it is something like "Knowledge is never independent of knowledge."
Carrol
; indeed alot of history is made as a result of agents
> ethical preferences. The independence assumption of 'historical
> methods' is too problematic to be of use at this juncture.
>
> Ian