The sequence (A) of results for n=1 to n=5 looks like (1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32) After 5 throws, the prob. of coming up with any *specific* sequence is 1/32, eg. {HHHHH} or {HTHTH} or {TTTTT}. . . etc.. But after 5 throws we actually want the total number of outcomes that have at least 1 H somewhere in them out of a total probability space of 32 eg. {HTTTT} or {THTTH} . . . . and so on. So it is actually easier to calculate what we dont want -- any outcome that has only tails, which it turns out is a very specific outcome: {TTTTT} and as a specific outcome is calculated by 1/2^5 = 1/32. Any other outcome will have at least 1 H somewhere in the set. So the probabilityof coming up with at least 1 Heads in 5 tosses is actually: 1 - (1/2)^5 = 1 - 1/32 = 32/33 Notice that the sequence (A) above for n tosses is decreasing: (1/2, 1/4, 1/8, . . ., (1/2)^n ) But if we take an extremely large number of trials, ie n --> infinity, the above sequence converges at 0 (as do all sequences of the form (r^n) where -1< r < 1). So the probability of us getting at least one Head approaches 1 as the number of trials icrease and approaches infinity: 1 - [limit n-->infinity (1/2)^n] = 1-0 = 1
Similarly the probability of eventually getting *at least one* 6 popping up after a series of throws of the dice increases as the sample space of dice throws increases. *Notice* that each individual dice throw, as Max/Matt/Zak correctly pointed out, is still 1/6 (So its easy to see how they came by their mistake). But as the sample size increases the chances of 6 popping up also increases. Again its eassier to measure prob. of 6 appearing by measuring the prob. of it not popping up ie. (1-1/6)^n = (5/6)^n where n is the number of throws. Similarly when n is sufficienly large the probability that a series of dice throws will *not* have a 6 somewhere in there progressively decreases until it become infinitesimally small (though never 0) Therefore the probability that 6 appears at least once increases as n throws of the dice increase. ( 1-(5/6)^n )
solidarity -pradeep