http://www.sciam.com/2001/1001issue/1001reviews1.html
(NB: The author, Kenneth Deffeyes, is evidently quite a character: he discovered that the proposed sites for the MX missile are rich in the most toxic mineral known to man, and managed to make quite a stink about it. See http://www.princeton.edu/hubbert/about-ken.html) -- Curtiss, nowhere near Michael Pugliese's level, but at least aspring to something these days
Macdonald Stainsby wrote:
> We must heed this, since we know the strategy of America is now going to
evolve
> somehow including the reconquest of the oil producing regions of the
planet.
>
> Aparently, several of the most "upstanding" media (such as the BBC) have
pointed
> out that the oil reserves are running dry right now (i.e: post 9/11).
Other
> "reputable" media have spoken of the first to go being Afghanistan,
followed by
> Iraq, followed by the joint re-occupation "green light" to Israel for the
> sounthern (name escapes me) valley of Lebanon recently liberated by the
> Hizb'allah guerilla army. That would co-incide with The Sudan being taken
by the
> Americans. I'm not interested in "decontructing" the forces at work
driving this
> war. I'm interested in calling for the end of it and hoping to marshal the
> people to that call.