One thing jumped out at me in the article. Japan, apparently, engaged in truly dramatic public works spending this decade, and seemingly for nothing. While it staved off immediate recession, it didn't lead to a sustained take off.
In theory, massive spending on infrastructure should have raised the productivity of Japan's economy and thus helped spark a recovery, yes?
I was left with the impression that Japan's money would have been better spent on research and universities rather than concrete (Krugman doesn't mention research, he only mentions that a lot of concrete was poured and that it didn't lead to a lasting recovery). Is it possible to spend too much on research? I know oversupply of any input can lead to an investment recession, but research, especially government sponsored research, seems like a special case. Yes?
--lk