<html>
<font size=3>This is true - look at WTO Seattle. On tuesday between
~10AM and 4PM the police repression was held in abeyance while the
massive labor march took place (which I participated in - not a cop in
sight on the march route or around the stadium).<br>
<br>
So the labor presence prevented the police from breaking up the
civ-disobedience youngsters blockading the WTO - in other words, they
were the key condition for its success in delaying the WTO for half a
day, causing the happy train wreck of the whole show.<br>
<br>
Think maybe the Clinton White House had something to do with this?<br>
<br>
At 09:31 AM 1/4/01 -0500, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>. . .<br>
Moreover, we ought to wake up to the fact that, with the <br>
disappearance of the Soviet Union & the socialist challenge, <br>
organized labor in America has become even more dispensable to the <br>
Democrats than in 1986 when _Prisoners..._ got published. Decades
of <br>
loyal anti-communist service on the part of the AFL-CIO have <br>
ironically resulted in its own relegation to the political margins.
Yoshie<br>
<br>
<br>
"Dispensable"? This is wildly inaccurate.<br>
The Party would be absolutely dead meat w/o<br>
labor. You must mean, labor's interests are<br>
dispensable, but there is no doubt labor's<br>
resources are essential. The wonder is how<br>
little labor gets/asks for in return.<br>
<br>
mbs<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></html>