<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>At the risk of being accused of triangulation, I have a position on the
<BR>Carey-Teamsters debacle which is neither that of Fitch [and Doug, although I
<BR>am not quite sure where Fitch ends and Doug begins] or Jason.
<BR>
<BR>Bevona, Cioa, the old DC 37 crowd, and the pre-Carey Teamsters, among others:
<BR>these are a special class of entirely useless labor "leaders," who want to
<BR>retain their sinecures simply because it allows them to "live high on the
<BR>hog." They are so into what is outright thievery [hence, their alliances
<BR>with organized crime], that they have been absolute disasters in advocating
<BR>for and representing their members. There is nothing redeeming about their
<BR>presence in the labor movement.
<BR>
<BR>One "smears" Carey and the Teamster reformers by classifying them in the same
<BR>category as these corrupt specimens. One of the reasons why Carey had such a
<BR>difficult reelection fight on his hands was that he had moved in dramatic
<BR>ways to clean out such elements from the Teamsters, the international union
<BR>in which they were most heavily entrenched; the hangman's noose had brought
<BR>incredible clarity and unity to these corrupt elements which are generally so
<BR>purely self-interested as to make cooperation impossible, and they were all
<BR>behind Hoffa Jr. Carey was also a faithful and forceful advocate of his
<BR>members' interests, and notwithstanding the usual ultra-left critiques of the
<BR>UPS strike, it was a major victory for the UPS workforce and the Teamsters.
<BR>
<BR>But it is wrong, to suggest as Jason did, that Carey "_did_ break the law,
<BR>but it wasn't very awful as these things go." There was something quite awful
<BR>about what Carey, Ansara and, it seems, Trumka did, and not because it was
<BR>illegal, but because it went straight to the core of union democracy. When
<BR>you take members' dues and use them, as an incumbent, for your own reelection
<BR>campaign, you have violated one of the primary precepts of union democracy.
<BR>It is just as if the incumbent in the White House took a billion or so
<BR>dollars out of the national treasury and funneled them into his reelection
<BR>campaign. It is simply unacceptable.
<BR>
<BR>There are violations of the law regarding union elections which one might
<BR>argue, plausibly, are not a "big thing." For example, it is clear that
<BR>McEntee of AFSCME, Stern of SEIU and Trumka of the AFL-CIO all raised money
<BR>[independently of the scandal surrounding the theft of members' dues] that
<BR>was given to the Carey campaign. Now there were legal prohibitions on such
<BR>outside donations, and there is no doubt that the law was violated in this
<BR>respect too. But one can make arguments both ways on the validity of the law.
<BR>Some point out that it is designed to keep employers from interfering in
<BR>union elections, and that no outside union official or politician should be
<BR>interfering in the democratic process through which the members elect their
<BR>leadership -- especially when, as in the case of the AFL-CIO and Trumka, you
<BR>are talking about an affiliate which elects you. On the other hand,
<BR>insurgents have claimed, with some justification, that such measures tie
<BR>their hands, making it virtually impossible to raise enough money to conduct
<BR>a serious campaign. Of course, as incumbents, this was not the problem of the
<BR>Carey-reformer slate, as they could rely upon donations from many Teamster
<BR>officials and locals.
<BR>
<BR>But what Carey, Ansara and, almost certainly, Trumka did was not a close
<BR>call, not an issue on which there are two sides one could argue. It was plain
<BR>and simple theft of the members' dues to use in the reelection campaign. We
<BR>would not stand for it for a minute if it was done by Hoffa Jr., and we
<BR>should not equivocate because it was done by "our guy."
<BR>
<BR>BTW, Nathan and Doug, I don't think you generally get to choose who ends up
<BR>in a foxhole with you. So get ready to hug.
<BR>
<BR>Leo Casey
<BR>United Federation of Teachers
<BR>260 Park Avenue South
<BR>New York, New York 10010-7272 (212-598-6869)
<BR>
<BR>Power concedes nothing without a demand.
<BR>It never has, and it never will.
<BR>If there is no struggle, there is no progress.
<BR>Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet deprecate agitation are men who
<BR>want crops without plowing the ground. They want rain without thunder and
<BR>lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters.
<BR><P ALIGN=CENTER>-- Frederick Douglass --
<BR>
<BR></P></FONT></HTML>