<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>On his chatty little website, TNR's Andrew Sullivan
(the Times's fav queer reactionary), advised David Horowitz to just pay the
Princetonian and be done with it. Never at a loss for many, many words, Horowtiz
responded, followed by an air-kiss by AS. Doug, when's the next time AS and
Katha are sharing a Slate morning coffee? Perhaps she can ask her friend about
his admiration for this creep.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>DP</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=3>"Andrew! This is a business deal that for the
moment has gone sour. These poor babies at the Prince couldn't come up with and
answer to my ten points, and didn't have the spine to reject an ad they didn't
like and take their hits. They solved their problem by blaming me for the fact
that they printed the ad and paid me back by calling me a racist -- knowing that
they could deny me the opportunity to answer them. I didn't make a deal to be
slandered. The decent thing for them to do was 1) reject the ad if that's the
way they felt about it and 2) explain to their readers why what I actually said
justified such -- what else to call it but hate speech. (If you think this
doesn't have real world consequences my friend, you are profoundly mistaken.) I
decided not to take their abuse lying down. This is to be a prima donna? Is this
the way business is normally conducted? Sure I'll take your money and give you
what you think you bought, but since I really don't like you, I'm going screw
you in the process. Yeah, gimme your cash and you can have the new car, but I'll
put sand in the gasoline tank as you drive away. Well, ok, but I'm not going to
pay for it. There's a bigger principle here Andrew, which I'm surprised you've
missed. There are thousands of Princeton students and not a few faculty members
who know now that they better not speak up if they think reparations are a bad
idea. Doing so - whatever their reasons or good intentions - will get them
called racists. I am not going to let them down, if I can help it. And neither
should you." - David. <BR></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=3>My response: "David, I take your points. I still
think you'd be better paying. No-one will mistake you for a coward or a wuss.
I'm not a fan of this kind of weasely response to you. <STRONG>I'm one of your
many admirers and fans</STRONG>. But if i were you, I'd let this one go. Cheers,
Andrew"</FONT><BR></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>