<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>(feel free to forward these ramblings--they are my own uncopyrighted stuff)
<BR>
<BR>--The idea that the FBI could fail to disclose thousands of pages of evidence
<BR>to the defense in the biggest capital case in American history should give us
<BR>all pause. If prosecutors at the absolute top of the legal food chain are so
<BR>dishonest or incompetant, what does that say about local law enforcement?
<BR> City and country District Attorneys? University cops?
<BR>
<BR>To be sure, Timothy McVeigh will not have anything overturned or re-examined
<BR>except during his official autopsy. What WE need to re-examine is our
<BR>adversarial, market-based system of justice. Any cursory glance at legal
<BR>documents will demonstrate that prosecutorial misconduct is so embedded in
<BR>our system that it's usually problematic to even call it misconduct.
<BR> Concerned citizens ought to complain loudly about this top-level snafu,
<BR>whatever our stance on the legalized euthenasia of racist murderers.
<BR>
<BR>--While I'm at it, should death penalty opponents publicly protest the
<BR>execution of McVeigh? It seems to me that if our principles are as
<BR>categorical as we make them out to be, we ought to remind those around us
<BR>that it is just as unjust to stick a needle in McVeigh's arm as it is to kill
<BR>the poor, often innocent people on death row everywhere.
<BR>
<BR>--Finally, in keeping with the penal/legal issues of the day, a poll:
<BR>
<BR>While many people are currently reconsidering the denial of voting rights to
<BR>convicted felons who've served their time, I wonder why we don't just go
<BR>ahead and let convicted felons both IN AND OUT of prison vote. Should
<BR>prisoners be given the right to vote?
<BR>
<BR>stannard</FONT></HTML>