<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3>I am not afraid to admit that I find the revelations of the intimate details
<BR>of Sullivan's sexual habits distasteful. It strikes me as pornographic in the
<BR>classic sense of the term, that is, as making public an intimate activity
<BR>which is private through a process which degrades the people at its center.
<BR>Why do we need such spectacles of degradation for our consumption? What
<BR>pleasure does that give us?
<BR>
<BR>Yes, I know all of the theory, and have even written about it myself for
<BR>publication, but I have become more and more convinced that there is
<BR>something perverse -- not the sexual part of it, but the degradation part of
<BR>it -- going on here. It is like talk show pornography, where people subject
<BR>themselves to the most humiliating sorts of ritual disclosure for 15 seconds
<BR>of fame. I cringe everytime I see one of these episodes, wondering what type
<BR>of inner pain would make someone submit themselves to such public
<BR>humiliation, and what type of gang rape voyeur mentality makes so many enjoy
<BR>watching it.
<BR>
<BR>Sullivan may indeed be a morally reprehensible man, if he is having high risk
<BR>sex with partners who are not aware that he is HIV+. But it would be hard to
<BR>come up with very many people whose HIV positivity is more a matter of public
<BR>knowledge [Magic Johnson and who else?], so it would have to be purely
<BR>anonymous sexual encounters with individuals who did not know who he was for
<BR>that to be the case. Given that set of facts, making his behavior a matter
<BR>of public discussion would do nothing to protect anyone, and, to the con
<BR>trary, it feeds all of the negative stereotypes of gay male sexuality.
<BR>Conversely, if his partners are fully aware of the risks, you have some
<BR>behavior which is certainly self-destructive, but I don't see where that is
<BR>any of our business. All manner of self-destructiveness goes on all the time.
<BR>
<BR>It is not surprising, to me at least, that the person to put this all into
<BR>print is Signorile, who pioneered the rather dubious practice of 'outing'
<BR>people.
<BR>
<BR>Leo Casey
<BR>United Federation of Teachers
<BR>260 Park Avenue South
<BR>New York, New York 10010-7272 (212-598-6869)
<BR>
<BR>Power concedes nothing without a demand.
<BR>It never has, and it never will.
<BR>If there is no struggle, there is no progress.
<BR>Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet deprecate agitation are men who
<BR>want crops without plowing the ground. They want rain without thunder and
<BR>lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters.
<BR><P ALIGN=CENTER>-- Frederick Douglass --
<BR>
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR></P></FONT></HTML>