<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>>>At 09:36 PM 7/27/01 +0000, you wrote: <DIV></DIV>>>>This a a jaw-dropping instance of my claim that one person' modus <DIV></DIV>>>>ponebs <DIV></DIV>>>>is another person's modus tollens. Kenneth agrees with me that if <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>>why are you talking about kenneth to everyone else? <DIV></DIV>> <DIV>Dearest Kells, doll, it's a rhetorical move. I turn to y'all and say, can y'all believe he said that? I note that in in his response, he doesn't actually engage; he just say that he doesn't agree and that he still thinks Habermas is the king of social theory. I really would like to know, Kenneth, why the criticism is misguided. As for me, I still haven't been given an incentive to back to Habermas. --jks</DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></html>