<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT class=bigHeadline>Stage
managers</FONT><BR><FONT class=all>By Michela Wrong</FONT><BR><BR>
<P></P><FONT class=allWide>On the night of January 17 1961 a convoy set off
across the savannah of Congo's southern Katanga region. Drawing up inwoodland,
soldiers led out threepassengers, their faces puffy from recent beatings. One by
one, each was positioned against a tree, shot, then flung into a trench. When a
clean-up squad was later dispatched to destroy the evidence, it came upon an
unnerving spectacle: from the shallow grave pointed the hand of the most
high-profile victim, as though attempting to draw the world's attention to these
clandestine killings.
<P></P>
<P>The dead hand belonged to Patrice Lumumba, the turbulent, charismatic,
elected prime minister of post-independence Congo. In this book, the work of a
Belgian sociologist, his accusatory finger appears finally to have triumphed
over four decades of obfuscation. Now translated into English, De Witte's book
has already prompted Belgium's parliament to establish a commission of inquiry
into Lumumba's death, which will deliver its findings later this year. It has
played a key role in bringing about a long-overdue reassessment of the role
Belgium played in the disastrous history of what is today the Democratic
Republic of Congo. </P>
<P>Barring the shootings of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, the death of
Patrice Lumumba was probably the most high-profile assassination of the decade,
a moment when a generation lost its virginity. Demonstrators stormed Belgian
embassies around the world. A politically active friend of mine remembers
protesting alongside the young Kofi Annan. Local offices of the United Nations,
which Lumumba had made the mistake of inviting to the Congo, were trashed.
Confidence in the UN's neutrality was shattered - some might argue that it has
never since recovered - and the world woke up to the superpower manipulations
that were to be the stuff of cold war politics for decades to come. </P>
<P>The thesis that the assassinations were not the sole work of Moise Tshombe,
president of the rebel copper province of Katanga, will surprise no one.
Africans have long attributed the deaths to shadowy white advisers,
puppet-masters with their eye on what one American ambassador of the day
described as the "Congo caviar" - its vast mineral resources. But commonly,
responsibility has been laid at the door of the CIA, which regarded the
Soviet-leaning Lumumba as another Castro and admitted at one point, ludicrously,
to drawing up plans to poison the prime minister's toothpaste. </P>
<P>De Witte clears the CIA of the ultimate act. Yes, Washington (like London)
wanted Lumumba dead and helped to create a consensus for a killing. But final
responsibility for Lumumba's actual elimination, De Witte says, lies not with
the Americans but with government ministers in Brussels and the security experts
Belgium had dispatched to Katanga. Nominally mere "advisers" to the
inexperienced leaders of a break-away province, these men in fact held all real
power in Katanga. Lumumba had insulted King Baudoin by denouncing Belgium's
colonial record in an impassioned independence ceremony speech. Wincing at his
acid rhetoric, Brussels decided he represented a threat to its hopes of
retaining long-distance economic control of Congo once autonomy had formally
been granted. </P>
<P>Piecing together cable exchanges and establishing chronology with the
meticulousness of a detective, De Witte concludes that while the bullets were
fired by Congolese soldiers, allowing the assassinations to be conveniently
dismissed as "a Bantu affair", the Belgians set the stage, prepared the scenery
and fed the actors their lines. At best, he convincingly argues, they stand
guilty of "non-assistance" to a person in danger. At worst, they were
accomplices to murder. </P>
<P>De Witte's book, which co-incides with a film about Lumumba by Haitian
director Raoul Peck, is more than just an electric jolt to Belgian complacency.
It raises questions about western policy in Africa that are certain to
reverberate for decades to come. </P>
<P>It also has its flaws. The author's anger over his own country's behaviour
runs so deep that he fails to explain convincingly why quite so many governments
and organisations decided that central Africa would be a better place without
Patrice </P>
<P>Lumumba, opting instead for Joseph Mobutu, the prime minister's former
private secretary and friend. For De Witte, who pins his philosophical colours
to the mast in a final chapter peppered with talk of "mobilisation of the
masses" and "bourgeois revolution", Lumumba died because he was a "radical
nationalist", and as such unacceptable to a generation of neo-colonialists. The
notion that western governments were genuinely alarmed by Lumumba's flirtation
with Khrushchev is briefly considered, only to be brushed aside. Many former
players, including Larry Devlin, CIA station chief, would reject this
assessment. Devlin remembers thousands of Soviet "advisers" flying in to
Leopoldville, convinced that Congo would be the ideal jumping-off point for a
communist takeover of central Africa. Whether valid or not, the view that
Lumumba was a dangerous naif, playing with forces he barely understood, must
hold the key to his eventual fate. </P>
<P>"It was never my intention to paint a black and white picture," De Witte
tells us at the start. "Lumumba was not a saint, but a human being."
Unfortunately, sanctify him he does, thereby weakening the impact of the book.
It should not be necessary to portray a leader as a hero to conclude that his
extra-judiciary execution is unacceptable. Just 36 when he boarded the fatal
flight to Katanga, Lumumba was eliminated too soon for any definitive assessment
of his legacy. In reality, he might well have followed a similar course to
Ghanaian contemporary Kwame Nkrumah: the early brilliance engulfed in sleaze,
idealism forgotten in the struggle for survival. Dead, Lumumba has been
transformed into one of Africa's great might-have-beens. </P>
<P>The point, surely, is not that Lumumba was a Mandela-like figure, the one man
who could have saved the country. It is that the west simply had no right to
make that decision on behalf of the Congolese people.
<P><B>THE ASSASSINATION OF LUMUMBA by Ludo de Witte, translated by Ann Wright
and Renee Fenby, Verso £17/$29, 235 pages <A
href="http://www.ftbookshop.com/">FT Bookshop</A> £15
</B><BR><BR></FONT></P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>