<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1255">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Bryan: It seems to me that in the discussion
about nationalism, the state, anarchism and such, especially between Chuck and
Dennis, that there is a need to make clear the distinction between culture and
state, especially in Anarchist thought (since that is the object of the
discussion). Rudolf Rocker's (imho the best of the Anarchist
thinkers) great book <EM>Nationalism and Culture</EM> juxtaposes Nation and
culture against one another: </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Rocker discusses how the nation-state's drive
for:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">"'purity of the culture'...by the deliberate
elimination of foreign influences...is just as unnatural as it is futile, and
merely shows that these peculiar fanatics for cultural autonomy have not
understood at all the profound significance of the cultural process. Such
distorted ideas have about the same meaning as saying to a man that he can
attain to the highest state of manhood only if he eliminates women from his
life..." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">"Culture unlooses the shackles that the
theological spirit of politics has fastened on the peoples. In this sense
it is in its deepest essence revelotionary. We indulge in profound
reflections about the evanescence of all existence and demonstrate that all the
great kingdoms which have played a world-commanding role in history were
irrevocably doomed to downfall as soon as they had attained the highest peak of
their culture. A number of well known historians have even maintained that
we have to do here with the inevitable operation of a definite law, to which all
historic process is subject. But really the fact that the decline or
downfall of a kingdom is not in any way equivalen to the decline of a culture
should indicate to us where the actual causes of the downfall are to be
sought. A political rulership can go down without leaving behind it a
trace of its former existence; with a culture it is quite otherwise. It
can, as it were, wither in a country where it has been disturbed in its natural
growth. In this event it looks for new possibilities of development
outside its old circle of operation, gradually enters upon new fields and
fertilizes there germs that were in a sense waiting for fertilization.
Thus there arise new forms of the cultural process, which doubtless differ
from the old, but nevertheless carry in theim its creative forces. Macedonian
and Roman conquerors could put an end to the political independence of the tiny
Greek city-republics; they could not prevent the transplanting of Greek
culture deep in Inner Asia, its growth to new bloom in Egypt, nor its
intellectual vitalizing of Rome herself." </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">(pp.346-48)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Bryan: So, if we can, to some degree, take
Rocker's statements as generalizable to Anarchist thought as a whole, there
would be no real contradiction in recognizing an (or many) American
Culture(s), or even feeling a cultural connection to them, while at the
same time rejecting the nationalist symbols of the culture such as the
American flag. Why, on the one hand, is there a need to connect up
American cultural forms organically to America as a nation-state formation (and
all its state symbols)? And, why, on the other hand is there a need to
reject the very notion of an (or many) American culture(s), as somehow
implicated inseperably with nationalism and governmental forms? Neither is
wholly true, each side overshoots its position. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Anyway, that is my two bits for
now</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Best Wishes,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Bryan</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">...by the way, below is what I was commenting
on:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Chuck:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">> That's funny, when I listen to jazz or
rock n' roll, I never think about<BR>> patriotism, the American flag, or even
America. I also don't associate<BR>> film noir or other interesting aspects
of pop culture with America(tm).<BR>> I don't know, it sounds like you've
been watching some shallow Ken Burns<BR>> documentary on "Anarchism." Either
that, or you've gotten a<BR>> one-dimensional Warner Brothers version of
it.<BR><BR>Dennis: "Then you must not listen to Louis Armstrong, who made this
connection rather<BR>clear (choosing the fake birthdate of July 4, 1900 for
added symbolism). Nor<BR>have you read the thoughts of Charlie Parker, a quiet
intellectual who<BR>revered much of the American experience, despite its racism.
Then there's<BR>Elvis, the Beach Boys, Little Richard, Jerry Lee Lewis, Howlin'
Wolf, among<BR>many others. And how about Jimi Hendrix's version of "The Star
Spangled<BR>Banner"? When asked if it was a protest version of the song,
Hendrix<BR>replied, "It just sounds beautiful to me."<BR><BR>How you can
disconnect such unique American forms from America itself is<BR>mind-boggling,
but consistent with your single-dimensional take on reality."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Bryan Atinsky<BR>IMC-Israel <BR>English
Editorial Coordinator<BR><A
href="http://www.indymedia.org.il">http://www.indymedia.org.il</A></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>