<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV> <DIV>Kelley replied, in response to my posts:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>>>Kelley said:<BR>>><BR>>> >is that your structuralism again, or are you just happy to see me?<BR>>><smile> Both!<BR>>><BR>>>BTW, I don't have anything against Structuralism, you big bully;<BR>><BR>>excuse me?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>No, excuse ME.  I'm afraid I didn't put in the winking smiley face; I'm spoofing with you.<BR>><BR>>>I said it's a great tool for the forces of good, but it's great powers can<BR>>>be also misused (forgive my metaphor; I just finished watching re-runs of<BR>>>the old Spider-Man and Fantastic Four cartoons).<BR>>><BR>>>Todd<BR>><BR>><BR>>i know what you said. i also told you that, despite your claims otherwise,<BR>>you are using a structuralist perspective.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I'd stared at that sentence for some time last night and hadn't got it.  I still don't understand it this morning.  Could you please explain what you're talking about?  And where did I claim otherwise i.e. that I am or am not using a structuralist perspective?  Seems to me I was a touch closer to a post-structuralist perspective, if anything (although, granted, one must start with a struc perspective to move into post-struc perspective).</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Todd</DIV> <DIV><BR>></DIV> <DIV>><BR>><BR>>kelley</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><BR><BR> </DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></html>