<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1255">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Journal Axes Gene Research on Jews and
Palestinians for Political Reasons </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">The London Observer<BR>November 25,
2001</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">A keynote research paper showing that Middle
Eastern Jews and Palestinians are genetically almost identical has been pulled
from a leading journal. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Academics who have already received copies of
Human Immunology have been urged to rip out the offending pages and throw them
away. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Such a drastic act of self-censorship is
unprecedented in research publishing and has created widespread disquiet,
generating fears that it may involve the suppression of scientific work that
questions Biblical dogma. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">'I have authored several hundred scientific
papers, some for Nature and Science, and this has never happened to me before,'
said the article's lead author, Spanish geneticist Professor Antonio
Arnaiz-Villena, of Complutense University in Madrid. 'I am stunned.'
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">British geneticist Sir Walter Bodmer added:
'If the journal didn't like the paper, they shouldn't have published it in the
first place. Why wait until it has appeared before acting like this?'
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">The journal's editor, Nicole Sucio-Foca, of
Columbia University, New York, claims the article provoked such a welter of
complaints over its extreme political writing that she was forced to repudiate
it. The article has been removed from Human Immunology's website, while letters
have been written to libraries and universities throughout the world asking them
to ignore or 'preferably to physically remove the relevant pages'.
Arnaiz-Villena has been sacked from the journal's editorial board. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Dolly Tyan, president of the American Society
of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, which runs the journal, told
subscribers that the society is 'offended and embarrassed'. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">The paper, 'The Origin of Palestinians and
their Genetic Relatedness with other Mediterranean Populations', involved
studying genetic variations in immune system genes among people in the Middle
East. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">In common with earlier studies, the team found
no data to support the idea that Jewish people were genetically distinct from
other people in the region. In doing so, the team's research challenges claims
that Jews are a special, chosen people and that Judaism can only be inherited.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Jews and Palestinians in the Middle East share
a very similar gene pool and must be considered closely related and not
genetically separate, the authors state. Rivalry between the two races is
therefore based 'in cultural and religious, but not in genetic differences',
they conclude. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">But the journal, having accepted the paper
earlier this year, now claims the article was politically biased and was written
using 'inappropriate' remarks about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Its editor
told the journal Nature last week that she was threatened by mass resignations
from members if she did not retract the article. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">Arnaiz-Villena says he has not seen a single
one of the accusations made against him, despite being promised the opportunity
to look at the letters sent to the journal. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">He accepts he used terms in the article that
laid him open to criticism. There is one reference to Jewish 'colonists' living
in the Gaza strip, and another that refers to Palestinian people living in
'concentration' camps. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">'Perhaps I should have used the words settlers
instead of colonists, but really, what is the difference?' he said.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">'And clearly, I should have said refugee, not
concentration, camps, but given that I was referring to settlements outside of
Israel - in Syria and Lebanon - that scarcely makes me anti-Jewish. References
to the history of the region, the ones that are supposed to be politically
offensive, were taken from the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and other text books.'
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">In the wake of the journal's actions, and
claims of mass protests about the article, several scientists have now written
to the society to support Arnaiz-Villena and to protest about their
heavy-handedness. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">One of them said: 'If Arnaiz-Villena had found
evidence that Jewish people were genetically very special, instead of ordinary,
you can be sure no one would have objected to the phrases he used in his
article. This is a very sad business.'<BR> <BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>