<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: Hitchens on genocide</title></head><body>
<div><br></div>
<div><x-tab> </x-tab>In 1992
there was a series of right-wing attacks on attempts by progressives
to commemorate the victims of the actual history of the Americas
during the five centuries of the Columbian era. Hitchens'<u>
Nation</u> column of 10/19/92 was one of those attacks.</div>
<div><x-tab> </x-tab>If
anyone has evidence that Hitchens recanted the sentiments supportive
of genocide expressed in this piece, and apologized to any of the
people he attacked, maybe they could post it.</div>
<div><x-tab> </x-tab>There
are continuities between this piece and current positions of Hitchens,
including its vocabulary. In the '92 column Hitchens ridiculed those
engaged in a fast in remembrance of the sufferings of Native Americans
as "masochistic", and said he himself would enjoy a
full-course meal.</div>
<div><x-tab> </x-tab>In his
10/8/2001 column "Against Rationalization" Hitchens referred
to "masochistic e-mail traffic from the Chomsky-Zinn-Finkelstein
quarter", i.e., anyone who didn't agree with his explicitly
anti-intellectual position on the events of 9/11.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Status: U<br>
X-Originating-IP: [130.63.75.220]<br>
From: "Jeet Heer" <jeetheer@hotmail.com><br>
To: lbo-talk@lists.panix.com<br>
Subject: Re: Hitchens on genocide<br>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 05:16:49 +0000<br>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Dec 2001 05:16:49.0970 (UTC)
FILETIME=[357A3920:01C17E15]<br>
Sender: owner-lbo-talk@lists.panix.com<br>
Reply-To: lbo-talk@lists.panix.com<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Could we return to the original question
which started this thread. I'm a big fan of Hitchen's pre-Sept. 11th
writing and was a bit taken aback by the quotation from his working
indicating that he believes the conquest and destruction of the Native
American population was a great boon to humanity. Does he really
believe this? If so, is he not a moral idiot? Does Peter or
anyone else know about the 1992 column that was quoted in
the original posting.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>
<hr></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
<a
href="http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp">http://explorer.msn.com</a
></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
</body>
</html>