--- Max Sawicky <sawicky at bellatlantic.net> wrote:
> I get the feeling that Hill staff read local papers
> for the same
> reason they monitor their constituents. They are
> sensitive
> to public opinion, but not necessarily in order to
> serve it.
> They may only want to use such information to craft
> their
> messages for self protection and promotion.
>
> By contrast, the 'serious' policy debate occurs more
> in
> the elite outlets. Cross an elite-sponsored piece
> of
> conventional wisdom in any way that matters and you
> can expect a hammering. This can look bad to the
> home folks, whose local papers echo the elite
> outlets, though they may be more porous with
> respect to anti-elite messages now and again.
> The remark about the local papers' reliance on
> canned material, including canned opinions,
> is salient here.
>
> So the disconnect between elected officials mirrors
> that between pols and their local rags.
>
> The potential of the local media, as I see it, is
> more
> long-term -- to try and change public opinion to the
> point where popular mobilization is sufficiently
> intense and informed to affect policy decisions.
>
> mbs
>
>
> >
> > Nathan Newman wrote:
> >
> > >Actually Congressional staffers read their home
> town newspapers
> > most closely,
> > >which is one of the problems with the whole
> obsession with DC pundits.
>
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/