Friedman's 4/3 NYT column

[Micheal Ellis]

>
>
>Fine- Friedman's been lying about his views on Israel for twenty years as a
>paid agent of the US government.  Whatever.  Not much to debate then.
>

well did he support the oslo/ camp david process or not? you said it yourself
that he criticized arafat for undermining oslo....why the flip flop now?
i hate to break this to you but NYT op eders just repeat U.S. /labor dove policy.
or whatever policy the U.S. supports at the time

zionists say "all priciple enemies of israel are anti semitic"
George Will write a column that states "all principle enemies of israel are anti semitic"
arial sharon calls arafat an "irrelevant man"
william saffire writes an article titled "irrelevant man" in which he refers to
arafat
George Bush call for withdrawal to 67 borders and a viable palestinian state
then Thomas Friedman writes

"Israel's goal must be a withdrawal from these areas captured in the 1967 war; otherwise it will never know a day's peace, and it will undermine every legitimate U.S. effort to fight terrorism around the globe."

pretty self explanatory......................

i would offer examples where Friedman just reiterated what clinton supported
(the oslo process) but those articles cost money to read.

he should be paid by the U.S. government. didn't he get a CIA sponsored
internship or something like that before he started writing for the times?

~M.E.